In the situation of a defendant appealing a judgment, what must the defendant's brother-in-law demonstrate regarding the bond?

In the context of Louisiana civil procedure, when a defendant is appealing a judgment, a bond is often required to ensure that the judgment will be satisfied if the appeal is unsuccessful. In this scenario, the role of the defendant's brother-in-law acting as surety is crucial. The brother-in-law must demonstrate his solvency to support the bond, meaning he needs to show that he has sufficient financial resources or assets to cover the amount of the bond if necessary.

The requirement of solvency is significant because it directly relates to the ability of the surety to fulfill the obligation of the bond. The court needs assurance that, should the appeal not go in favor of the defendant, there are adequate resources to pay the judgment amount. This protects the interests of the plaintiff and ensures compliance with any potential judgment.

In contrast, options involving having a valid license to act as surety, providing collateral, or holding a legal degree are not requirements for the brother-in-law in this situation. The focus remains primarily on demonstrating solvency to validate the bond's enforceability, which underlines why the aspect of solvency is the correct choice in this instance.