What is one major requirement for the introduction of fraud evidence at the trial?

In Louisiana civil procedure, the introduction of evidence related to fraud generally requires that it be relevant and admissible under the rules of evidence. One major requirement is that the plaintiff must not object to its introduction. If the plaintiff has no objections, the court is more inclined to allow such evidence to be presented, as it suggests that all parties are prepared to engage with the evidence being introduced.

This principle underscores the importance of procedural compliance and the impact that a party's consent or lack of objection can have on the admission of evidence at trial. In situations where a plaintiff raises an objection, it can impede the introduction of potentially pertinent fraud evidence, necessitating the need for the court to evaluate the relevance and admissibility of the evidence under the rules of evidence and existing case law.

Other factors may indeed influence whether the evidence is ultimately admitted, such as judicial discretion or the nature of the evidence, but the lack of an objection from the plaintiff is a critical factor that can determine whether fraud evidence is considered by the court during the trial.