What is the primary reason Television Station can file for writ of attachment against Bob's property?

The primary reason Television Station can file for a writ of attachment against Bob's property is that Bob is a non-resident with no agent for service of process. In Louisiana, a writ of attachment is often sought to seize a defendant's property to secure a claim against them, especially when there's a concern that the defendant may be difficult to personally serve or may not respond to legal actions due to being outside the jurisdiction.

When a defendant is a non-resident, the plaintiff may face challenges in serving legal documents, which is a prerequisite for jurisdiction over the individual in a suit. The availability of an attachment allows the plaintiff to ensure that they can secure any potential judgment against the defendant's property in the state where the action is brought, despite the defendant’s residency status preventing traditional service.

This context indicates the importance of the defendant's residency and service of process in actions related to attachment. If Bob were a resident or had an agent for service in Louisiana, that would allow the plaintiff to pursue other remedies without needing to attach property. Other circumstances, like a history of bankruptcy or inability to pay debts, do not directly impact the right to utilize the writ of attachment in the same manner.