What must happen regarding depositions of witnesses if the case involves multiple distinct claims brought by different plaintiffs?

In the context of Louisiana civil procedure, when a case involves multiple distinct claims brought by different plaintiffs, the ability to conduct depositions efficiently is important. The correct approach is to allow all plaintiffs to be deposed in one session. This is beneficial as it promotes judicial efficiency and can save time and resources for both the parties involved and the court.

Additionally, having all plaintiffs deposed together can facilitate a more comprehensive understanding of the issues at stake since the claims may overlap in certain respects, even if they are distinct. It also allows for a clearer context during the questioning since the deponent witnesses may have information relevant to the other plaintiffs’ claims.

While separate depositions, limited questioning based on commonality, or restricting testimony to the primary claim might address certain concerns, they could lead to unnecessary duplicative efforts or confused lines of questioning. By conducting a joint deposition session, the process becomes streamlined, ultimately benefiting the efficiency and clarity needed in civil litigation.