When a lawyer signs a pleading for a client, which of the following is NOT one of the personal certifications made by the lawyer?

The correct answer emphasizes that the requirement for a lawyer to make personal certifications regarding pleadings does not include the necessity to have discussed the case with opposing counsel. Instead, the personal certifications that the attorney must provide focus on the lawyer's own assessments and responsibilities regarding the filing.

Attorneys are expected to certify that pleadings are warranted by existing law or represent a good faith argument for change, that they have read the pleading and believe it to be well-grounded in fact, and that the pleading is not submitted for improper purposes. These certifications are geared towards ensuring the integrity of the court process and the ethical responsibilities of the attorney in representing their client.

Conversely, the requirement to discuss the case with opposing counsel is not part of these formal certifications. While communication can be a critical aspect of legal representation and resolution of disputes, it does not factor into the specific certifications that accompany a pleading. Therefore, it is not included as one of the core responsibilities that the lawyer certifies when signing the pleading.